By G. Hønneland
This ebook analyses the Russian competition to the 2010 Barents Sea delimitation contract in gentle of either the legislation of the ocean and Russian id, arguing that the agreement's critics and proponents inscribe themselves into assorted Russian narratives approximately Russia's rightful position on the earth.
Read Online or Download Arctic Politics, the Law of the Sea and Russian Identity: The Barents Sea Delimitation Agreement in Russian Public Debate PDF
Similar war & peace books
Because the finish of the chilly battle, United international locations peace operations became a longtime and favourite function of worldwide politics. From Liberia to East Timor, the UN now includes out large governance-related services and is an important political strength in Southern states and societies. right here Richard Al-Qaq leads us to an intensive new knowing of the UN and its position in foreign politics.
"Retrieving the older yet unusually overlooked language of loved ones governance, economic system of strength deals a thorough new account of the old upward thrust of the social realm and fantastically social thought as smooth sorts of oikonomikos - the paintings and technology of loved ones rule. The suggestions and family ideologies of loved ones management are hugely transportable and play a remarkably valuable function in overseas and imperial relatives.
- Civilians and Modern War : Armed Conflict and the Ideology of Violence
- Islam and Political Reform in Saudi Arabia: The Quest for Political Change and Reform (Routledge Studies in Political Islam)
- Handbook on World Social Forum Activism
- Internationalizing and Privatizing War and Peace
Extra info for Arctic Politics, the Law of the Sea and Russian Identity: The Barents Sea Delimitation Agreement in Russian Public Debate
Hønneland (2012) Making Fishery Agreements Work: Post-Agreement Bargaining in the Barents Sea (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar). The chapter is based on that book. Nordlys, 20 October 1976. For a review of Russian policy on Svalbard after the Second World War, see J. H. Jørgensen (2010) Russisk svalbardpolitikk: Svalbard sett fra den andre siden (Trondheim: Tapir). 0004 Jurisdiction and Fisheries Management This situation continues to this day; see T. Pedersen (2008) ‘The Constrained Politics of the Svalbard Offshore Area’, Marine Policy, 32, 913–19; and T.
Some of the first comments on the delimitation treaty in the Russian newspapers refer to discord between Norway and Russia on fisheryrelated matters. 0005 Russian Reactions to the Delimitation Agreement of Russian fishing vessels in the disputed area’, often for ‘trivial offenses’ as a result of ‘the obstinacy of the Norwegian border protection service’. ) Norwegian and Russian fishery regulations are beset by ‘numerous inconsistencies’, writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta in its 28 April edition (an unfounded allegation as it happens.
Where vessels fished was up to the senior officials in the major fisheries associations in Murmansk, which themselves were instruments of the Soviet fisheries ministry’s department in the northwest. The freedom of individual ships to act independently was also constrained because trawlers were expected to operate in unison. So even if a Norwegian inspector succeeded in convincing a Soviet captain of the need to move the fleet to protect the young fish, the captain would have to contact officials on shore and relay the information provided by the Norwegian Coast Guard.
Arctic Politics, the Law of the Sea and Russian Identity: The Barents Sea Delimitation Agreement in Russian Public Debate by G. Hønneland
- Download PDF by Alexander Riley, W. S. F. Pickering, William Watts Miller: Durkheim, the Durkheimians, and the Arts
- Clayton L. Thyne's How International Relations Affect Civil Conflict: Cheap PDF